Hong Kong Financial News

Hong Kong Financial News

What you need to know in order to out-beat the Hong Kong Stock Market

Hong Kong Financial News RSS Feed
 
 
 
 

Posts tagged accumulator

Big HKD 200 million accumulator loss by a rich old woman

No one should under-estimate the wealth of anyone in HK. Yesterday the headlines of most newspapers are about an unknown 76-year-old-woman (which looks more like a woman in her late 50s or early 60s) suing UBS for misleading her to buy a series of accumulator contracts which led to a loss of over HKD 200 million. The old woman claims she only has a primary three education and does not read or understand English.

I am not surprised that there are lawsuits like this suing investment banks for advising uneducated or illiterate people to buy accumulator products that made them some money at the beginning and lost a big fortune at the end. But what is the most intriguing is how she amassed such a big fortune… HK is really a place where you can make a lot of money…

A South China Morning Post article on accumulators

I came across an article on accumulators this past Saturday. It is quite informative; I’ve included it here for the benefits of our readers. Also, our reader can find our article on accumulators at this link: http://www.hkfinancialnews.com/?p=89.

Great for bankers, but a crazy deal for investors Why equity accumulators got dubbed ‘kill you later’

South China Morning Post

25 January 2009

In the second in a series of articles by Alan Alanson, the Road Warrior takes a sceptical look at a notorious banking product sold in the city.

One of the most infamous financial products peddled in Hong Kong of late is the equity accumulator. This is because pretty much everyone who bought one in the past 18 months has lost loads of money, earning it the apt nickname of “kill you later”.

The equity accumulator enables an investor to “accumulate” stocks at a discount to the market. If you were to purchase an accumulator today on China Mobile or ICBC stock, it would mean that you would start to purchase shares in these companies at about a 25 per cent discount to their trading price. If you were like me, when your banker pitched this product, you probably thought he was crazy to offer this deal. Turns out that you would be crazy to fall for it.

Buying stocks at a discount to the market sounds pretty good, but there is a little more to it. The first catch is that an accumulator is not a one-off transaction. It generally lasts 12 months and you have to commit at least US$1 million, with which you accumulate the stock regularly.

The next catch is that once you enter the accumulator, the price you pay for the stock is fixed. So the price you pay on the first day is the same as what you pay on the last day. If the traded price of the stock on day one is HK$100, you will pay something like HK$75. But if the price on the last day, or any other day over that one year, is HK$80, you will still pay HK$75 and only be getting a 6 per cent discount, not 25 per cent.

And of course, as everyone who bought this product last year now knows, if the stock price falls below HK$75, you end up paying more for the stock than it is worth.

There is another catch. If the stock price happens to rise more than about 4 or 5 per cent, the accumulator contract is over. The bank returns your money and you stop accumulating stocks at a discount. So although you take the risk of any fall in the stock price, no matter how great, the bank does not take the risk of any rise in the stock price. The bank takes the risk of only a 4 or 5 per cent rise and so limits its risk. The investor’s risk is unlimited; the bank’s is fixed.

Although you need to commit US$1 million, or HK$7.8 million, to be able to buy this product, to make our illustration simpler to follow let us assume the entry point is HK$1 million. So you commit your HK$1 million, say, to a China Mobile accumulator contract at a 25 per cent discount and the contract will be terminated if China Mobile rises 4 per cent.

We assume the stock is priced HK$100 the day you buy the accumulator. This would make your discounted purchase price, or strike price, HK$75. Since your HK$1 million is spread out over a year, you invest about HK$83,333 a month. So you buy about 1,111 shares every month at the strike price.

Now, three things can happen: the stock could rise, fall or stay relatively flat. With the accumulator, it is only in the last scenario that the investor really wins.

If the stock falls, the outcome is clear. If it falls by exactly 25 per cent, the return on your investment from then on is zero. If it falls more than 25 per cent (slips below HK$75), you begin to lose money.

If in the first month the stock begins to drop and the average price for the month is HK$90, your profit for the month will be about HK$16,700. If it continues to fall by HK$10 a month for the next two months, your profit will be HK$5,600 for the next month and then a loss of HK$5,600 for the third month.

If it drops to HK$60 in the fourth month and stays around there for the rest of the contract, you will lose about HK$16,700 a month until your 12 months are up, leaving you down for the year by something like HK$133,000.

The actual numbers would be slightly different as the stock purchases would be made only on trading days, and that varies from month to month, but you get the picture.

Now, if the stock stays basically flat for the 12 months, the potential profit is huge. If it stays at around HK$100, the investor stands to make about HK$330,000. But how often does any stock stay flat for more than a week, let alone a year?

The third scenario is that the stock rises. If it rises more than 4 per cent, the contract is over. If the stock price happens to be slightly less than the HK$104 threshold for a month before it rises to the point that the contract is terminated, the investor would make about HK$32,000 for the month (buying the 1,111 shares at a discount of HK$29). Now, that does not sound too bad. The investor makes HK$32,000, gets all his capital back after one month and is free to buy another accumulator.

But that return is 3.2 per cent, as the investor had to commit HK$1 million to make this HK$32,000. In committing that HK$1 million, the investor assumed the risk that the stock could fall by any amount and he would still bear all the losses.

And once again, bear in mind that the upside is limited and the downside is unlimited.

You might make a whole lot of money if the market stays flat for 12 months. But it is more likely you will make a small amount if the market rises, or lose a whole lot if it falls.

There is an even riskier version of the accumulator out there. Some banks refer to it as a leveraged accumulator. In this product, everything is the same except the initial discount that you get is substantially larger, about 35 per cent rather than 25. But if the stock falls below the discounted price, you must buy double the amount of stock you would buy if the stock price was above the discounted price.

This version has the same fixed upside, but doubles the downside.

And if that is not scary enough, there is one last twist, something that seemed so generous last year but turned into a nightmare. Some private banks offering this product are prepared to do the trade for their clients without an upfront payment. So long as your account has 30 per cent of the accumulator cost, you can enter the accumulator without having to come up with the other 70 per cent. So if your bank balance is US$1 million, you can enter a US$3.33 million accumulator. This is great when the market is rising, as you multiply your profits. But if the market falls, you multiply your losses.

In the scenario above, where the share price falls and you end up losing HK$133,000, this would be a 13.3 per cent loss if the initial investment was HK$1 million. But if the initial investment was only HK$300,000, the HK$133,000 loss represents a 44 per cent loss. So you have not doubled, but tripled your losses!

Combine the leveraged accumulator with a 30 per cent investment amount and it is not hard to see how you could end up owing the bank money. Plenty of people took this risk last year and plenty of private banks made money selling this product to their (now substantially poorer) customers.

So weigh your risks and returns properly before you get into this one.

CITIC Pacific (267) update: Vernon Moore

CITIC Pacific has resumed trading today and it has dropped 7.3% and ended the day at HKD 5.59.

CITIC Pacific released a circular yesterday and included some of the foreign exchange accumulator derivative contracts that CITIC Pacific had signed with various banks as exhibits. (The documents are available at http://www.sfc.hk/dod/jsp/EN/DoDmain.jsp?StockCode=00267)  As discovered  by the media, contrary to what the board of directors claimed that they were not aware of the contracts until September this year, one of the directors, Vernon Francis Moore, actually signed on some of the contracts back in 2007. He should know about the contracts for a long time. Currently SFC the regulator is investigating this case; Mr. Moore will definitely have some explaining to do when the regulator calls him.

While the people who are said to be involved in this case (e.g. Francis Yung) have either been demoted or moved to other part of the Company as disciplinary actions, Mr. Moore is keep his position. What’s going on here?

What is an accumulator structured product?

In Hong Kong, this type of accumulator / decumulator was very extremely popular in 2007 among all private banks. Private banking clients were making good money every day that time. But things change quickly and in this bear market environment these investores are incurring big losses every day with these accumulator contracts that were started during the bull year. The media has even given accumulators a very appropriate name of “I kill you later”.

What are these contracts actually? If you are familiar with options, they are actually a set of one long in-the-money call option, and two short out-of-the-money options. Let’s look at a simple example of one year HSBC accumulator contract.

Suppose the share price of HSBC is HK$100. If you buy a one-year accumulator contract, here is what you will get on each trading day:

You will get to buy a certain number of HSBC shares at a set price, usually at a discount to the current share price, e.g. HK$ 97, for the entire year.

So as long as the share price of HSBC is above $97, you can receive the shares and sell the shares on the market, and you make money every day for one year!

Of course there are catches. It will be very costly to long a series of call options. To make the transaction cheaper, the call option is a knock-out option because it is cheaper. A knock-out option limits the upside you can get. For example, if the knock-out value is HK$ 105 and one day the share price is above HK$105, the whole contract expires and you won’t be receiving any more shares from that day onward.

Furthermore, to make the accumulator cheaper, the investor are selling two puts to subsidize the cost of the knock-out call. When shorting a put, the investor receives share at a higher price when the share price is below the strike price. Let’s say the put strike price in the above HSBC accumulator example is $92: when the current share price is $90, the investor will be required to receive a certain number of shares at $92. The investor is losing $2 per share he receives. And to make the matter worse, since you are shorting two puts for each call, you will be receiving twice the number of shares at $92! With the stock market losing more than 50% this year, we can see that there are a lot of private banking clients who are receiving lots of shares every day at a price much higher than the current price!

Basically with an accumulator, you’ve got limited upside but doubled unlimted downside.

A decumulator works the opposite way. This is essentially the opposite of an accumulator. The investor longs a put and shorts two calls.

 Accumulator Payout Diagram

Derivative loss: Kowloon Development (34) is another Citic Pacific

Kowloon Development is off 42% today. Similar to Citic Pacific (267), the Company has announced that from 1 January 2008 to 22 October 2008 they have incurred a loss of HK$ 3.7 billion from over-the counter contingent forward agreements. So far only HK$ 688 million has been accounted for in their half year report. So there will probably be an additional HK$ 3 billion charge in their 2008 annual report.

According to the announcement, the company “has liquidated a majority of its financial investments” and “unwound a substantial portion of its forward agreements” in Oct 2008. I suspect this may be a big reason why the stock market can drop so much recently. Corporates, private banking customers are just unwinding their derivative contracts that have caused them so much trouble this year. People are receiving margin calls, they can’t do much but to cut their positions.

One thing interesting to see in their announcement is that the announcement is trying to avoid the use of words such as “accumulator” or “decumulator”. The way they describe how their so-called “over-the counter contingent forward agreements” work are just like the accumulator / decumulator contracts that every one in Hong Kong has talked or criticized about. Their forward agreements allow the company to “purchase or sell certain listed equity investments at a fixed price over a 52-week period.” This is exactly what an accumulator / decumulator does!

Kowloon Development, stop pretending! You are just like a lot of see-lais or housewives who have incurred big losses buying accumulator products.

CITIC Pacific (267) - Big loss on foreign exchange bets

CITIC Pacific (267) has just issued a big profit earning this afternoon. This is not due to their main businesses, but rather, they have bet wrongly on foreign exchange rates. They have bought massive foreign currency target redemption forward contracts and daily accrual (accumulator) contracts for AUD and EUR. All was working very well in the first half of the year, but things start to turn bad with the big and sudden drop in AUD and EUR in the past few weeks.

CITIC Pacific has exposures to currencies such as AUD and EUR because of their mining projects in Australia. On the other hand, they have bought contracts with notional values that are a lot higher that what they need. A hedging tool, that was supposedly good for the company, has turned into a tool for speculation. When speculation turns sour, shareholders lose their shirts. CITIC Pacific has realized a loss of HKD 807 million on these contracts from 1 July to 17 October, and they believe they will continue to loss money on these contracts until 2010 since not all contracts can be terminated or unwound. At the same time, they are making a provisional loss of HKD 15.5 billion for these contracts.

This case is very similar to what is happening in Korea: With a 40% drop in Korean Won from its height, a lot of SMEs in Korea are suffering because of the foreign exchange contracts they have with the banks. Should companies actually take a view on foreign exchange? Maybe not… since even market professionals can’t predict what is going to happen in the next few days.

I expect a big drop in 267’s share price tomorrow!

Click Here For The Wall Street Journal Online

 

eToro

 

 

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

Recent Posts

Categories

Blogroll

Pages