Hong Kong Financial News

Hong Kong Financial News

What you need to know in order to out-beat the Hong Kong Stock Market

Hong Kong Financial News RSS Feed
 
 
 
 

Archive for General Trends

HK Stocks this week (March 1 - March 5 2010)

With National People’s Congress in Beijing this week, people are expecting announcement on the country’s directions from Wen Jiabao this Friday morning (March 5 2010). People are mainly expecting the government will:

i) Continue to promote consumption inside the country

ii) Promote agriculture and increase the living standard of its citizens, particularly the inland western areas

iii) Slow down the increase in real estate price, slowly deflating the asset bubble

Sectors of the week

This should benefit the following sectors:

Consumer (discretionary and staples), Agriculture

 and affect the following sectors negatively:

Banks, Real Estate

Stock picks of the week:

Digital China (861 HK) (IT stock, P/E relatively low - 15 times)

Chaoda (623 HK) (Agriculture stock, low P/E - 7 times)

China Green (904 HK) (Agriculture stock, low P/E - 15 times)

Happy 2010!

With the HSI rising more than 52% in 2009, let’s hope there will be a repeat in 2010!

Here is my strategy for HK Stocks this year:

  • Subscribe for IPO (particularly for the smaller ones with an inbound consumer focus)
  • Policy-driven trading: Follow the news closely. Any policy change will trigger new sells and buys and any of these trends can easily last for a week. A lot of Chinese companies are dependant on the central government’s policy. With the government worrying about a double dip in the middle of this year, more stimulus packages will possibly be rolled out to support certain industry segments and some stimulus packages will be withdrawn to prevent over-heating of some segments.

Happy Trading for 2010 everyone!

Big HKD 200 million accumulator loss by a rich old woman

No one should under-estimate the wealth of anyone in HK. Yesterday the headlines of most newspapers are about an unknown 76-year-old-woman (which looks more like a woman in her late 50s or early 60s) suing UBS for misleading her to buy a series of accumulator contracts which led to a loss of over HKD 200 million. The old woman claims she only has a primary three education and does not read or understand English.

I am not surprised that there are lawsuits like this suing investment banks for advising uneducated or illiterate people to buy accumulator products that made them some money at the beginning and lost a big fortune at the end. But what is the most intriguing is how she amassed such a big fortune… HK is really a place where you can make a lot of money…

What has happened to Hong Kong’s entrepreneurial spirits?

This is an excerpt from David Webb’s newsletter today:

Thought for the day: after locking up hundreds of tourists in a hotel to boost the tourism industry/in the vain hope of isolating HK from swine flu, we are now the only territory in the world to shut down all schools, ironically at the same time as announcing plans to make HK an education hub by dolling out land to “private universities”. Is the government giving up on our public universities? How can you build a university with only 200,000 sq ft of floor area anyway - equivalent to about 10 floors of the Cheung Kong Centre? Meanwhile HK Disneyland responds to the kindergarten/primary shutdown by launching a special unlimited entry pass for children before the end of June. At least, we thought, there is some entrepreneurialism left in HK, albeit imported. But not so fast - lest we forget, this is the world’s only Government-owned Disneyland. The offer no longer appears on the Disney web site.

It just seems to me that the Hong Kong government has been telling people that they are pushing some industries to grow, but at the end most end up dying… Since the Tung Chee Wa’s era, we have seen: dot com, Chinese medicine, Islamic finance, wine trading, etc. But none of them are really prospering at the moment. Hong Kong government really need to think hard why this is happening. Are the policies too short-sighted? Has the government spent enough resources in promoting these industries? Maybe the environment in HK is really stifling the entrepreneurial spirits that were founded in HK thirty years ago?

Hong Kong Stock Exchange and the SFC – The latest laughing stock of the financial world

After asserting that the blackout rule would not change because of the sudden protest by a group of listed company directors three days before the rule was supposed to be implemented, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange has finally succumbed to the pressure of the ultra-wealthy company directors and politicians, and has backed down to make the new blackout plan more palatable to the wealthy company directors.

Under the new rule that will come effect on 1 April 2009, the black out period for insider dealing will be 60 days for annual report, and 30 days for quarterly or other interim reports.

This is just another blatant example of the government catering for the rich people. What’s going on with the SFC and the HKEx staying so firmly on their position and then bowing down to political pressure a few months later?

A South China Morning Post article on accumulators

I came across an article on accumulators this past Saturday. It is quite informative; I’ve included it here for the benefits of our readers. Also, our reader can find our article on accumulators at this link: http://www.hkfinancialnews.com/?p=89.

Great for bankers, but a crazy deal for investors Why equity accumulators got dubbed ‘kill you later’

South China Morning Post

25 January 2009

In the second in a series of articles by Alan Alanson, the Road Warrior takes a sceptical look at a notorious banking product sold in the city.

One of the most infamous financial products peddled in Hong Kong of late is the equity accumulator. This is because pretty much everyone who bought one in the past 18 months has lost loads of money, earning it the apt nickname of “kill you later”.

The equity accumulator enables an investor to “accumulate” stocks at a discount to the market. If you were to purchase an accumulator today on China Mobile or ICBC stock, it would mean that you would start to purchase shares in these companies at about a 25 per cent discount to their trading price. If you were like me, when your banker pitched this product, you probably thought he was crazy to offer this deal. Turns out that you would be crazy to fall for it.

Buying stocks at a discount to the market sounds pretty good, but there is a little more to it. The first catch is that an accumulator is not a one-off transaction. It generally lasts 12 months and you have to commit at least US$1 million, with which you accumulate the stock regularly.

The next catch is that once you enter the accumulator, the price you pay for the stock is fixed. So the price you pay on the first day is the same as what you pay on the last day. If the traded price of the stock on day one is HK$100, you will pay something like HK$75. But if the price on the last day, or any other day over that one year, is HK$80, you will still pay HK$75 and only be getting a 6 per cent discount, not 25 per cent.

And of course, as everyone who bought this product last year now knows, if the stock price falls below HK$75, you end up paying more for the stock than it is worth.

There is another catch. If the stock price happens to rise more than about 4 or 5 per cent, the accumulator contract is over. The bank returns your money and you stop accumulating stocks at a discount. So although you take the risk of any fall in the stock price, no matter how great, the bank does not take the risk of any rise in the stock price. The bank takes the risk of only a 4 or 5 per cent rise and so limits its risk. The investor’s risk is unlimited; the bank’s is fixed.

Although you need to commit US$1 million, or HK$7.8 million, to be able to buy this product, to make our illustration simpler to follow let us assume the entry point is HK$1 million. So you commit your HK$1 million, say, to a China Mobile accumulator contract at a 25 per cent discount and the contract will be terminated if China Mobile rises 4 per cent.

We assume the stock is priced HK$100 the day you buy the accumulator. This would make your discounted purchase price, or strike price, HK$75. Since your HK$1 million is spread out over a year, you invest about HK$83,333 a month. So you buy about 1,111 shares every month at the strike price.

Now, three things can happen: the stock could rise, fall or stay relatively flat. With the accumulator, it is only in the last scenario that the investor really wins.

If the stock falls, the outcome is clear. If it falls by exactly 25 per cent, the return on your investment from then on is zero. If it falls more than 25 per cent (slips below HK$75), you begin to lose money.

If in the first month the stock begins to drop and the average price for the month is HK$90, your profit for the month will be about HK$16,700. If it continues to fall by HK$10 a month for the next two months, your profit will be HK$5,600 for the next month and then a loss of HK$5,600 for the third month.

If it drops to HK$60 in the fourth month and stays around there for the rest of the contract, you will lose about HK$16,700 a month until your 12 months are up, leaving you down for the year by something like HK$133,000.

The actual numbers would be slightly different as the stock purchases would be made only on trading days, and that varies from month to month, but you get the picture.

Now, if the stock stays basically flat for the 12 months, the potential profit is huge. If it stays at around HK$100, the investor stands to make about HK$330,000. But how often does any stock stay flat for more than a week, let alone a year?

The third scenario is that the stock rises. If it rises more than 4 per cent, the contract is over. If the stock price happens to be slightly less than the HK$104 threshold for a month before it rises to the point that the contract is terminated, the investor would make about HK$32,000 for the month (buying the 1,111 shares at a discount of HK$29). Now, that does not sound too bad. The investor makes HK$32,000, gets all his capital back after one month and is free to buy another accumulator.

But that return is 3.2 per cent, as the investor had to commit HK$1 million to make this HK$32,000. In committing that HK$1 million, the investor assumed the risk that the stock could fall by any amount and he would still bear all the losses.

And once again, bear in mind that the upside is limited and the downside is unlimited.

You might make a whole lot of money if the market stays flat for 12 months. But it is more likely you will make a small amount if the market rises, or lose a whole lot if it falls.

There is an even riskier version of the accumulator out there. Some banks refer to it as a leveraged accumulator. In this product, everything is the same except the initial discount that you get is substantially larger, about 35 per cent rather than 25. But if the stock falls below the discounted price, you must buy double the amount of stock you would buy if the stock price was above the discounted price.

This version has the same fixed upside, but doubles the downside.

And if that is not scary enough, there is one last twist, something that seemed so generous last year but turned into a nightmare. Some private banks offering this product are prepared to do the trade for their clients without an upfront payment. So long as your account has 30 per cent of the accumulator cost, you can enter the accumulator without having to come up with the other 70 per cent. So if your bank balance is US$1 million, you can enter a US$3.33 million accumulator. This is great when the market is rising, as you multiply your profits. But if the market falls, you multiply your losses.

In the scenario above, where the share price falls and you end up losing HK$133,000, this would be a 13.3 per cent loss if the initial investment was HK$1 million. But if the initial investment was only HK$300,000, the HK$133,000 loss represents a 44 per cent loss. So you have not doubled, but tripled your losses!

Combine the leveraged accumulator with a 30 per cent investment amount and it is not hard to see how you could end up owing the bank money. Plenty of people took this risk last year and plenty of private banks made money selling this product to their (now substantially poorer) customers.

So weigh your risks and returns properly before you get into this one.

Blackout rule stays, but is deferred till April 09

After strong push by a group of listed company directors led by David Li, Chairman of Bank of East Asia, the SFC didn’t relent and said that the extended blackout rule will stay. But it will postpone the rule for four more months (the rule will be in effective starting April 09) as a compromise.

This is good news for the minority shareholders. Corporate governance, disclosure and insider trading are definitely a much bigger issue in Hong Kong than in other western markets. Most of the listed companies in Hong Kong are 50% or more owned by the major shareholders and a lot of the companies are not too transparent (particularly in some small caps). In the US, a major shareholder seldom owns more than 20% of a company. Therefore, the major shareholders here in Hong Kong can actually know more a lot more info about their own companies, can control their companies more easily and can manipulate share price of their companies more easily than major shareholders in the western markets. Undoubtedly, with these additional powers to the major shareholders here, there should be added restrictions placed to them in order to provide a more level playing field with minority shareholders.

One interesting fact to note is that David Li, who is leading the effort in ending this extended black out rule, has been tainted with allegations of insider trading this year. He himself has paid a big fine to the SEC in the US early this year to settle the insider trading case of Dow Jones. Even though in the case he ended up not denying or admitting SEC’s allegations, he is tainted in this case and he is definitely not the right person to head up this effort to oppose this rule which is meant to reduce insider trading. It is just like a criminal protesting outside the High Court, asking all laws to be abolished! What a joke!

The rich rallying against the new black out rule

There were front page advertisements on major newspapers yesterday by a group consisting of 236 HK-listed companies, 6 professional groups (which include prominent figures such as David Li, Bank of East Asia Chairman) protesting against the new extended blackout period on directors’ dealings in their companies’ securities. The amendment will be effective starting 1 Jan 2009 and from 2009 onwards, directors can not deal with their companies’ securities from the end of financial period to the announcement of the relevant results. Currently the blackout only exists in the month before the announcement of results.

Why do they protest only 3 days before the change will be implemented? The proposed changes have been consulted properly (there is a consultation paper on this matter, published back in January 2008) and most listed company directors should know about this proposed change since it has been discussed in the media and there is even a Webb report on this matter back in April 2008 (http://www.webb-site.com/articles/blackout.htm). Somehow they just realized right before the change is implemented that it is against their interests. What are they doing now? They have money, so they spend money to buy front page advertisements on most newspapers to try to badmouth the Hong Kong Exchange, saying that the changes will be “detrimental to Hong Kong’s position as international financial centre”, in the hope that the SFC or the government will stop this new rule. Will the government succumb to these rich people’s demands? I definitely don’t think so and with the government approval rating at its lowest, agreeing to stopping this black out rule change will just further undermine the credibility of the Hong Kong government, in the mind of the general population. I definitely believe that what these listed company directors are doing is just plain stupid.

As to whether their claims have merits or not, I will discuss it tomorrow. Stay tuned!

Renminbi (CNY, RMB) may not depreciate as much as people thought

There are opinions saying that the Chinese government will not let RMB depreciate further as the government will not rely on exports only to support the economy (Remember China has a growing domestic market!)  Furthermore, this can lead to capital outflow from China, and depreciation of other Asian currencies. This view is supported by JP Morgan chief China economist Frank Gong and Director of Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) Yu Yong Ding.

Their views seem to be right with the RMB stabilizing in the past few days.

RMB finally has started to drop against USD

Over the weekend, RMB has dropped 0.72% against the USD. It always surprised me that how come the RMB has not dropped even a little bit when other currencies like EUR, CAD, AUD and NZD have dropped more than 20% or more against the USD.

As the exchange rate is controlled by the Chinese government, I don’t see why the Chinese government would not prefer a weaker currency as this would help the export industries in China. The currency definitely has room to depreciate as it has appreciated quite fast in the past few years.

It would not be too surprising to see the exchange rate to go back to 1 USD = 7 RMB soon.

Click Here For The Wall Street Journal Online

 

eToro

 

 

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

Recent Posts

Categories

Blogroll

Pages