Hong Kong Financial News

Hong Kong Financial News

What you need to know in order to out-beat the Hong Kong Stock Market

Hong Kong Financial News RSS Feed
 
 
 
 

Archive for January, 2009

A South China Morning Post article on accumulators

I came across an article on accumulators this past Saturday. It is quite informative; I’ve included it here for the benefits of our readers. Also, our reader can find our article on accumulators at this link: http://www.hkfinancialnews.com/?p=89.

Great for bankers, but a crazy deal for investors Why equity accumulators got dubbed ‘kill you later’

South China Morning Post

25 January 2009

In the second in a series of articles by Alan Alanson, the Road Warrior takes a sceptical look at a notorious banking product sold in the city.

One of the most infamous financial products peddled in Hong Kong of late is the equity accumulator. This is because pretty much everyone who bought one in the past 18 months has lost loads of money, earning it the apt nickname of “kill you later”.

The equity accumulator enables an investor to “accumulate” stocks at a discount to the market. If you were to purchase an accumulator today on China Mobile or ICBC stock, it would mean that you would start to purchase shares in these companies at about a 25 per cent discount to their trading price. If you were like me, when your banker pitched this product, you probably thought he was crazy to offer this deal. Turns out that you would be crazy to fall for it.

Buying stocks at a discount to the market sounds pretty good, but there is a little more to it. The first catch is that an accumulator is not a one-off transaction. It generally lasts 12 months and you have to commit at least US$1 million, with which you accumulate the stock regularly.

The next catch is that once you enter the accumulator, the price you pay for the stock is fixed. So the price you pay on the first day is the same as what you pay on the last day. If the traded price of the stock on day one is HK$100, you will pay something like HK$75. But if the price on the last day, or any other day over that one year, is HK$80, you will still pay HK$75 and only be getting a 6 per cent discount, not 25 per cent.

And of course, as everyone who bought this product last year now knows, if the stock price falls below HK$75, you end up paying more for the stock than it is worth.

There is another catch. If the stock price happens to rise more than about 4 or 5 per cent, the accumulator contract is over. The bank returns your money and you stop accumulating stocks at a discount. So although you take the risk of any fall in the stock price, no matter how great, the bank does not take the risk of any rise in the stock price. The bank takes the risk of only a 4 or 5 per cent rise and so limits its risk. The investor’s risk is unlimited; the bank’s is fixed.

Although you need to commit US$1 million, or HK$7.8 million, to be able to buy this product, to make our illustration simpler to follow let us assume the entry point is HK$1 million. So you commit your HK$1 million, say, to a China Mobile accumulator contract at a 25 per cent discount and the contract will be terminated if China Mobile rises 4 per cent.

We assume the stock is priced HK$100 the day you buy the accumulator. This would make your discounted purchase price, or strike price, HK$75. Since your HK$1 million is spread out over a year, you invest about HK$83,333 a month. So you buy about 1,111 shares every month at the strike price.

Now, three things can happen: the stock could rise, fall or stay relatively flat. With the accumulator, it is only in the last scenario that the investor really wins.

If the stock falls, the outcome is clear. If it falls by exactly 25 per cent, the return on your investment from then on is zero. If it falls more than 25 per cent (slips below HK$75), you begin to lose money.

If in the first month the stock begins to drop and the average price for the month is HK$90, your profit for the month will be about HK$16,700. If it continues to fall by HK$10 a month for the next two months, your profit will be HK$5,600 for the next month and then a loss of HK$5,600 for the third month.

If it drops to HK$60 in the fourth month and stays around there for the rest of the contract, you will lose about HK$16,700 a month until your 12 months are up, leaving you down for the year by something like HK$133,000.

The actual numbers would be slightly different as the stock purchases would be made only on trading days, and that varies from month to month, but you get the picture.

Now, if the stock stays basically flat for the 12 months, the potential profit is huge. If it stays at around HK$100, the investor stands to make about HK$330,000. But how often does any stock stay flat for more than a week, let alone a year?

The third scenario is that the stock rises. If it rises more than 4 per cent, the contract is over. If the stock price happens to be slightly less than the HK$104 threshold for a month before it rises to the point that the contract is terminated, the investor would make about HK$32,000 for the month (buying the 1,111 shares at a discount of HK$29). Now, that does not sound too bad. The investor makes HK$32,000, gets all his capital back after one month and is free to buy another accumulator.

But that return is 3.2 per cent, as the investor had to commit HK$1 million to make this HK$32,000. In committing that HK$1 million, the investor assumed the risk that the stock could fall by any amount and he would still bear all the losses.

And once again, bear in mind that the upside is limited and the downside is unlimited.

You might make a whole lot of money if the market stays flat for 12 months. But it is more likely you will make a small amount if the market rises, or lose a whole lot if it falls.

There is an even riskier version of the accumulator out there. Some banks refer to it as a leveraged accumulator. In this product, everything is the same except the initial discount that you get is substantially larger, about 35 per cent rather than 25. But if the stock falls below the discounted price, you must buy double the amount of stock you would buy if the stock price was above the discounted price.

This version has the same fixed upside, but doubles the downside.

And if that is not scary enough, there is one last twist, something that seemed so generous last year but turned into a nightmare. Some private banks offering this product are prepared to do the trade for their clients without an upfront payment. So long as your account has 30 per cent of the accumulator cost, you can enter the accumulator without having to come up with the other 70 per cent. So if your bank balance is US$1 million, you can enter a US$3.33 million accumulator. This is great when the market is rising, as you multiply your profits. But if the market falls, you multiply your losses.

In the scenario above, where the share price falls and you end up losing HK$133,000, this would be a 13.3 per cent loss if the initial investment was HK$1 million. But if the initial investment was only HK$300,000, the HK$133,000 loss represents a 44 per cent loss. So you have not doubled, but tripled your losses!

Combine the leveraged accumulator with a 30 per cent investment amount and it is not hard to see how you could end up owing the bank money. Plenty of people took this risk last year and plenty of private banks made money selling this product to their (now substantially poorer) customers.

So weigh your risks and returns properly before you get into this one.

Leung Ngok, Chairman of U-right, bankrupt

According to Ming Pao today, Leung Ngok, the Chairman of U-Right (0627), has been declared bankrupt by the Hong Kong High Court. He is the first chairman of a HK-listed company to be bankrupt in this financial crisis.

E*Trade HK is rolling out its stock trading platform

People in Hong Kong will soon have a much better online platform to trade Hong Kong stocks as E*Trade Hong Kong is rolling out its stock trading platform. The online trading platforms that other brokerages in Hong Kong have are just plain pathetic.

On the other hand, if you are in the U.S. and want to start trading in the Hong Kong stock market, you can also use E-trade too. You can open a global account in E*trade where you can trade equities in Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan and the UK.

First Natural Foods (1076) under provisional liquidation; Chairman is still on the run

Update on the First Natural Foods case (http://www.hkfinancialnews.com/?p=111): The Chairman, Yeung Chung Lung, is still nowhere to be found and the High Court has appointed Stephen Liu Yiu Keung and David Yen Ching Wai of Ernst & Young to be the provisional liquidators of the Company.

According to Apple Daily, other than Deutsche Bank filing a claim against the Company, Taishin Bank, Commerz East Asia, E. Sun Bank, Shanghai Commercial & Saving Bank, Entie Bank, Yuanta Bank, ICIC Bank, Orix Asia, and Shin Kong Financial Holding have extended HKD 196 million of loan to the Company at the end of 2006. They have held a meeting on 19 Dec 2008 to discuss strategy on how to recover the funds.

China Communications Construction (1800) involved in bribery probe

As reported by the Hong Kong Standard today, a fully owned subsidiary of China Communications Construction (1800), China Harbour Engineering Co Ltd, was alleged in bribery in order to win a port contract in Bangladesh.

I am doubtful whether today’s drop in share price (more than 6%; closed at HKD 8.85) is due to this bribery case. I think it is mainly due to the general weakness today. Come on, if you add China and Bangladesh together, I would be very surprised if there wasn’t any bribery or unethical money transfer involved!

eSun (0571) cancelled its placement plan

eSun (0571) has announced that they have terminated their placement plan because (i) the recent increase in its share price and (ii) the uncertainty resulting from the injunction brought by Passport Capital (Passport Special Opportunities Master Fund and Passport Global Master Fund). On the other hand, eSun will vigorously seek damages and remedies against Passport in the hearing on 22 January 2009. At the same time, the Court has asked Passport to provide a bank guarantee of HKD 120 million in the case the Court rules favourably towards eSun for compensation of damages. This amount of HKD 120 million is the total amount of money that the placement (new shares plus warrants) could have brought to the Company.

It seems like eSun and Passport will fight ’vigorously’ in court. Passport has won part I of the battle — the placement is not going ahead already. Will eSun win part II of the battle? Personally I would think that eSun should be able to get something from Passport — definitely not the entire HKD 120 million, but probably a few millions? One fact that I believe is very favourable towards eSun is that the placement price was actually above the then-trading price when the placement was announced. The share price jumped only after Passport filed an injunction against eSun.

False rumour on Cheng Yu-Tung of New World Development (0017)

On 7 Jan 2008, there was a rumour in the afternoon saying that the chairman of New World Development (0017) was seriously ill in hospital. At one point, the share price dropped more than 6% in 5 minutes. Journalists quickly called New World Development for clarification. Seeing that he had been badmouthed badly, Cheng came out of his office in New World Tower in Central and told people that he is super healthy! The share price then went back up 3% in the next few minutes.

eSun (0571): Peter Lam vs Passport Capital

Passport Capital is snapping an injunction again eSun’s share placement  announced in December 2008. The High Court has requested the hearing to be held on 22 January. The private share placement is 120,000,000 new shares at the price of HKD 0.50, with a warrant, exercisable at HKD 0.50, attached to each new shares. The total proceeds from the shares would be around HKD 58 million and the proceeds from the warrants, if fully exercised, will be another HKD 60 million. 

This fight is full of interesting facts. Next Magazine actually has a feature article on this. Some interesting facts include:

- Passport Capital is arguing that this private placement at such a low price is destroying shareholder value. When this placement was announced, eSun’s share price was HKD 0.37. Now the share price has gone up to HKD 1.50 (as of 7 Jan closing).  It has quadrupled since the announcement! Before it was arguable whether the placement was actually destroying shareholder value since the placement price was above the then-trading price. But now, it definitely looks like it is severely destroying current shareholders’ equity.

- Also, the total amount of the placement, HKD 118 million, is actually quite little compared to the HKD 1.88 Billion cash that they have as of 30 June 2008. Passport Capital is arguing that since they have that much cash already for the Macau project, why would they need to raise further cash? Furthermore, I suppose that most projects in Macau are currently on hold.

- It is rumoured, according to Next Magazine, that the “actual” purpose for this private placement is to dilute the stake of Passport Capital. Passport Capital is currently the second-largest shareholder with 28%. And Lai Sun Development (0488), also controlled by Peter Lam, is the largest shareholder with 36%.

- The shareholding structure of eSun is very interesting too. There is a cross-holding structure. eSun and Lai Sun Development have cross shareholding of 36% of each other (i.e. eSun holds 36% of Lai Sun Development and Lai Sun Development also holds 36% of eSun). Maybe Peter Lam is worried that Passport Capital will control Lai Sun Development once they become the biggest shareholder of eSun, and therefore is using this private placement to dilute Passport Capital’s stake.

- Passport Capital has been accumulating eSun for quite a while already. They have started accumulating when the share price was around HKD 4 -5 (back in late 2007). Their stake in eSun is definitely still in the red. But with the big increase in the past few days, I won’t be too surprised that their stake starts making money!

The price of eSun will continue to be volatile in the next few days until the hearing is over. This stock will definitely be a very good stock for shorting trading!

Liquidation Hearing for 3D-Gold has been adjourned to 4 May 2008

The High Court yesterday has adjourned the 3D-Gold liquidation hearing for 4 months to 4th May 2008. There weren’t further details about this adjournment in most news sources. Most likely the provisional liquidator and their legal counsels just wanted more time and there wasn’t such a hurry to process a liquidation.

All Citic Pacific (267) directors are being investigated by the SFC

From an announcement today, all directors (executive, non-executive and independent non-executive), except one, are the subject of investigation by the SFC. The only one director not being investigated is Peter Kruyt, who is just an alternate director to Mr. André Desmarais.

The entire list of directors being investigated are: Messrs. Larry Yung Chi Kin, Henry Fan Hung Ling, Peter Lee Chung Hing, Carl Yung Ming Jie, Vernon Francis Moore, Li Shilin, Liu Jifu, Milton Law Ming To, Wang Ande, Kwok Man Leung, Willie Chang, André Desmarais, Chang Zhenming, Hamilton Ho Hau Hay, Alexander Reid Hamilton, Hansen Loh Chung Hon and Norman Ho Hau Chong.

Click Here For The Wall Street Journal Online

 

eToro

 

 

January 2009
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Archives

Recent Posts

Categories

Blogroll

Pages